Author Topic: Global Search Scroll Bug  (Read 31 times)

Offline Slinky

  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Global Search Scroll Bug
« on: Yesterday at 11:08:23 am »
Morning,

sorry, found a bug in the process you explained to me the other day regarding deleting single entries in the global search history list.

I did as you said, once opening the global search history box, and used the arrow keys to move down, all went well for roughly 3 boxes/pages worth of scrolling down, then the list freezes and the selected item cycles back to the top of the visible items in the "frozen" list, kind of like it's reached the bottom of the list, but it hasn't, not by a long shot according to the scroll bar.

this issue does not appear if you grab the scroll bar and move it with the mouse, also, if you use that method to get past the "sticking point" it repeats it again about the same distance down again.


Found this as i was litterally starting at the top and removing old entries or mistypes in the list

Offline Rdl

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4095
Re: Global Search Scroll Bug
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 03:46:49 pm »
Please, how many items are in list, how many items are displayer at once and exact steps to reproduce.

Offline Slinky

  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Re: Global Search Scroll Bug
« Reply #2 on: Today at 10:47:12 am »
Morning, so....
how many items in list: - Lots, hence why i was trying to reduce it, initially sifting the no longer erquired first
how many items are displayer at once: - Eight
exact steps to reproduce: - easier to show you this than try and explain, streamable video link coming your way via pm shortly

Offline Slinky

  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Re: Global Search Scroll Bug
« Reply #3 on: Today at 10:58:28 am »
update,

so apparently, instead of using the down arrow, if i use the scroll wheel on my mouse this "jumping back" issue doesn't occur

Offline Rdl

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4095
Re: Global Search Scroll Bug
« Reply #4 on: Today at 11:00:37 am »
Good to know. I'll take a look at a later date due to pending version using different compiler. I do not want to chase bugs twice :)